Writing Effective Evals Playbook
Writing Effective Evals Playbook
This playbook turns the chapter patterns into an operating loop: design, offline validation, pilot, production monitoring, and refresh. Because apparently shipping an LLM system once and never measuring it again remains frowned upon by reality.
Five-minute triage
- Good: The failure is tied to a named slice, a versioned dataset, and a threshold someone agreed to before the run.
- Bad: The team debates whether the aggregate score feels fine, a famously precise scientific instrument.
- Ugly: The production trace is partial, the user label is ambiguous, and the rollback owner is in a different timezone.
Pattern menu by lifecycle
| Lifecycle | Good pattern | Bad shortcut | Ugly escalation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | Risk-backed hypothesis | Metric shopping | Stakeholders disagree on failure |
| Offline | Golden and stress sets | One borrowed benchmark | Leakage suspected after launch |
| Pilot | Canary with thresholds | Big-bang deploy | Sample too small for confidence |
| Production | Drift and slice monitoring | Dashboard worship | Judge drift requires relabeling |